Pending editor decision = the academic editor is making a final decision. It usually takes around 48 hours. Originally, I thought that both major and minor revisions were equal to accept, as long as I revised them one by one. But recently I also had an article in the second revision process (only one was submitted for review and was still in battle, and the other one was already recommended for acceptance after the first revision), and because of that b.
Power Supply Unit (PSU) Sumber Energi Komputer Teknik Komputer
Generally, in the first part of the review comments, there should be a concluding evaluation, that is, minor revision, major revision, and rejection. This will influence the editor's final verdict. It can be written like this: 1. Sci rework does not write major repair and minor repair but only revise. What does it mean? It is my first time to submit to sci. On the interface for returning opinions, I see that others are major revise or minor revise. Why do I only have one revise? What does this mean? Look. This is a carefully done.
Major revision and minor revision are called major revision and minor revision respectively. In fact, they represent a tendency of reviewers. A major means that the reviewer of this paper feels that the problem is relatively big, but it is not irreversible, and it just requires relatively large changes to the article.
Pending major or minor revisions = author revisions are in progress. I would like to ask, does the IEEE journal accept with mandatory minor revisions and return to reviewers after two rounds?
